Every body questions ancient Indian
wisdom and caste system in India.
There was no proof or history
where one caste killed another caste person by stating caste alone as a reason.
Kshatriyas married Brhamins.Brhmins
married kshatriyas.
Kshatriyas married all castes.
Sahnatanu married fisher
woman and children ruled india . that is
the story fo mahabahrata.
Yayati , kshatriya married
Devayani( daughter of Shukra charya, Brhamin)
Vasishta married “Arundhaati “
, who is shudra lady.
However, castes are respecting
each others thinking and life style and priority of their lives.
It is by “Guna”, Varna is
defined. I call it priority or value
system.
Brahmins pripority is knowledge,
especially spiritual knowledge.
Kshatriya’s prinority is
protecting people and land.
Vuasya’s priority is agriculture
and trade and making money for sthe society.
Shudras are working force ,
that means employees, like us.
Now read, western phiolosophy,
who heavily criticize Hindu caste sytem.
Christians fought not among religions
lines, but among countries for the rule.
It is created by rulers.
Yes, there were no fights among
Indian religions, NOR among castes.
Earlier, Shri Adi Shankaracharya
improved understanding between six sects
of Hinduism. That is why he is called
“ snamata sthapana” (
established 6 religion sects in Hinduism) . In reality, there is no HINDUISM,
as we have Sanatana Dharma, old religion.
We accepted all religions and
decalred ”Buddha” and Rishibha( jain
originator) as incarnation fo Vishnu.
Only politicians get votes
among lines of castes. They divided people on castes.
There is only one class, Rich
and Poor. They fight .But it is Rich who win.
Because, they divide and rule
others.
It is not British, nor
congress, who ever rules, he divides and rules.
When British tried to rule india,
they thought there were not enough religions who fight in India
As Jains, Busshists were not fighting with Hindus .
So they said, Sikhs are
different religion. Even they never fought with Hindus
except under Congress rule.
So castism was thought as
dividing factor. Even that was not mentioned a single time as
Vaisya caste Gandhi was leading others. He also
called “sudras who are not part of four Hindu
caste system ” as panchama (Harijan) > how that caste was created as they
were “untouchables”
Not because of caste, but as
they were not sent out like British sent out crimilnals to Australia.
There was only one punishment
called” desha bahishkarana”) sendng out of country.
These people had a choice to go
to neighboring country.but many never went ,but stayed in outskirts of the city
and were dependent on kingdom for survival. Many compassionate people fed
them.But
They were not having
citizenship. Thus they became a bid creed. Please do nto confuse them with
Tribals as tribal’s have their
own customs and they never allowed any one in their group.
Westerners never had patience
nor understood Ancient Indian culture ,but started criticizing castes
And multi God system, which
shows we tolerate others ,But DO NOT ELIMINATE OTHERS
LIKE Americans eliminated ”Red Indians” and
Europeans eliminated “Nomads”.
In conclusion, Indian caste system
was meant to be good for work classification. Subsequently, some un wanted
elements or practices might have crept in, but on the whole, understanding
And mututal trust and
co-operation if cultivated, society will benefit than aboloishing
Castes which will create more confusion.
Any system can be a problem,
instead of abolishing, it has to be resurrected.
Caste systems gives easy living
as valvue system is different castes while “ justice “is same for all.
Pl. give your comments on “Ancient
Indian system- Caste system”.
No comments:
Post a Comment